Gynecology Surgical Instruments Market: Growth Factors On the basis of type, the global market is segregated into forceps, trocars, vaginal speculums, uterine sounds, uterine curettes, scissors, needle holders, dilators, and uterine depressors.īased on the application, the market is categorized into hysteroscopy, colposcopy, laparoscopy, dilation and curettage, endometrial biopsy, cervical cryosurgery, and endometrial ablation.ĭepending on the end user, the market is classified into ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals, and clinics. The global gynecology surgical instruments market is segmented into its type, application, and end-user. Gynecology Surgical Instruments Market: Segmentation The major gynecology surgical procedures include hysteroscopy, dilation and curettage, colposcopy, loop electrosurgical excision, and pelvic laparoscopy. Thus, these instruments are also popularly known as obstetrics-gynecology surgical instruments. ![]() In many areas of medical surgery, the instruments that are used by gynecologists are similar to that used by obstetricians. The female reproductive organs include fallopian tubes, uterus, vagina, ovaries, cervix, and vulva. The instruments that are designed especially for the surgeries and medical specialties that are concerned with the female reproductive organs are known as gynecology surgical instruments. Request Free Sample Gynecology Surgical Instruments Market: Overview © 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.According to the report, global demand for the Gynecology Surgical Instruments market was valued at approximately USD 1925.2 million in 2019 and is expected to generate revenue of around USD 3152.7 million by end of 2026, growing at a CAGR of around 7.3 % between 2020 and the 2026. : NCT03427957.Įndometrial biopsy hysteroscopic forceps hysteroscopy outpatient setting pain. Snake and alligator hysteroscopic forceps may be considered the first choice to perform an endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women. The alligator and snake forceps reported wider biopsy than the spoon forceps (P < 0.001). The spoon forceps received significantly lower scores by the operator compared to the alligator and snake forceps (P < 0.001). ![]() The spoon forceps group reported higher levels of pain compared to the alligator and snake forceps groups (P < 0.001). No differences were observed about the number of attempts (P = 0.602), the use of another instrument (P = 0.276), and the biopsy appropriateness (P = 0.592). The duration of the biopsy was comparable between the three groups (P = 0.334) with a median of 180 seconds (range 20-480 seconds). ![]() Seventy-five women were included in the study, 25 in each group. Women were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) in three groups and allocated to undergo endometrial biopsy by hysteroscopy using spoon, alligator, or snake forceps. Operative hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy was performed by hysteroscopic forceps. Postmenopausal women undergoing operative hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding or endometrial thickness (≥5 mm) were included. ![]() To compare three types of biopsy forceps for hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |